malakassis, he never said that I played crap. Everyone of us had phases where he could beat the other one in most of the games.
#48 nice ;)
malakassis : I wouldn't be surprised either, coming from this stream
We are the champions! Gone are the bunnies!
@malakassis: LOL?
Highly suspicious? 1300's statements, the pedantic ones and you does not give anything as a clue.
1. I played on Kabeljau's streams more than one time and, certainly, I got defeated many times by him, the anonymous IM "TheYellowKing" -with his drunk account called musclebrain- and, in fact, lost in the 2vs2 chess variation.
2. One Lichess user, kindly, defended me at KC's streams, with the question I asked KC before: "What engine plays -h4"; then, someone responded: oh, yes, Fritz could do it, switching off it and then, play what you want. What was the result? A 1200 player defeated the engine user on time:
http://es.lichess.org/Pen4knMR
3. In my message #31, I responded him solidly -quoting him, indeed- about his fallacies and responded them, waiting Kingscrusher -or some of his fanboys- responds me properly to the axioms I established.
4. Could you post all the games? It's quite interesting that our result table -Kabeljau's and mine- are very near each other and I lost against him many games -which you can check, analyse or do whatever you want- here:
http://es.lichess.org/@/Kabeljaukrieger/me
5. It is quite stupid you say someone about "cheating" when he said us clearly his experience in our games, and, positionally -avoiding to name vodka's effects- we can talk a lot about.
A chip off the old block...
Highly suspicious? 1300's statements, the pedantic ones and you does not give anything as a clue.
1. I played on Kabeljau's streams more than one time and, certainly, I got defeated many times by him, the anonymous IM "TheYellowKing" -with his drunk account called musclebrain- and, in fact, lost in the 2vs2 chess variation.
2. One Lichess user, kindly, defended me at KC's streams, with the question I asked KC before: "What engine plays -h4"; then, someone responded: oh, yes, Fritz could do it, switching off it and then, play what you want. What was the result? A 1200 player defeated the engine user on time:
http://es.lichess.org/Pen4knMR
3. In my message #31, I responded him solidly -quoting him, indeed- about his fallacies and responded them, waiting Kingscrusher -or some of his fanboys- responds me properly to the axioms I established.
4. Could you post all the games? It's quite interesting that our result table -Kabeljau's and mine- are very near each other and I lost against him many games -which you can check, analyse or do whatever you want- here:
http://es.lichess.org/@/Kabeljaukrieger/me
5. It is quite stupid you say someone about "cheating" when he said us clearly his experience in our games, and, positionally -avoiding to name vodka's effects- we can talk a lot about.
A chip off the old block...
@cocafanta:
"lol I watched some of the concerned "streams" and I can only fully agree with kingscrusher on his points ...
Congrats to KC for offering chess fans a real stream."
In fact, I'm really glad you enjoy it; that's the most important thing: your happiness.
On the other hand, we -the skeptics- are still waiting his response, point-by-point and not commenting only two lines like it was refutation but it was just a kind of hysteria attack -quite common in his videos and our PM-
I invite you to say me how an engine can play -h4 in a 3+0 time, and, with quick exchanging of pieces when the rematch happened. Someone tried it against a patzer and failed. What would you do?
In fact, something you want to say me, or my statements, just do it..., all can be done with respect and solid viewpoints.
"lol I watched some of the concerned "streams" and I can only fully agree with kingscrusher on his points ...
Congrats to KC for offering chess fans a real stream."
In fact, I'm really glad you enjoy it; that's the most important thing: your happiness.
On the other hand, we -the skeptics- are still waiting his response, point-by-point and not commenting only two lines like it was refutation but it was just a kind of hysteria attack -quite common in his videos and our PM-
I invite you to say me how an engine can play -h4 in a 3+0 time, and, with quick exchanging of pieces when the rematch happened. Someone tried it against a patzer and failed. What would you do?
In fact, something you want to say me, or my statements, just do it..., all can be done with respect and solid viewpoints.
With cocafanta (Zeblakop on twitch) it's hard to have a serious discussion anyway, he was once trolling my stream, saying all the time that I'm a really crappy chess player. Don't take him seriously in any way, he doesn't seem to have a life apart from trolling on the internet.
Just a simple question: what's the point of claiming the LM title and starting an official stream if you're a cheater? You'd just overexpose yourself to the risk of getting caught. KC, stop playing the martyr role.
@Zaitzev: just let us see your face during the stream, so haters cannot accuse you of using 2 different computers, one for playing and one for cheating ;D
@Zaitzev: just let us see your face during the stream, so haters cannot accuse you of using 2 different computers, one for playing and one for cheating ;D
In fact, I remember a "Zeblakop" on Chessbomb...; certainly...
The main problem is not based on trolling, the main problem is based on you spend sometime trying to respond them with solid statements and then, they even does not respond you, even at least, not point by point...
The main problem is not based on trolling, the main problem is based on you spend sometime trying to respond them with solid statements and then, they even does not respond you, even at least, not point by point...
@Marte:
It's not about showing my face. In fact, by that axiom, we can say that KCs cheats in all his games because he had never his face live, or ChessNetwork...
The main clues of my innocence are based on my games, my statements, his silence, and his troll statements based in..., exactly: emptiness.
It's not about showing my face. In fact, by that axiom, we can say that KCs cheats in all his games because he had never his face live, or ChessNetwork...
The main clues of my innocence are based on my games, my statements, his silence, and his troll statements based in..., exactly: emptiness.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.