Contradiction, aka typo.
@Under-the-radar said in #51:
> Contradiction, aka typo.
God doesn't make neither typos nor contradictions.
> Contradiction, aka typo.
God doesn't make neither typos nor contradictions.
@twighead said in #16:
> Muhammad and Jesus sitting in a tree, K I S S I N G
>
> First comes love, then comes marriage, then comes a 4th abrahamic religion in a baby carriage!
>
> That's not all! That's not all! This new religion has to kill everyone in the rest of them!
>
> Well... That wasn't their idea in the first place, but 200 years from now it will be!
you are offending way too many prople
> Muhammad and Jesus sitting in a tree, K I S S I N G
>
> First comes love, then comes marriage, then comes a 4th abrahamic religion in a baby carriage!
>
> That's not all! That's not all! This new religion has to kill everyone in the rest of them!
>
> Well... That wasn't their idea in the first place, but 200 years from now it will be!
you are offending way too many prople
@WassimBerbar said in #52:
> God doesn't make neither typos nor contradictions.
God? Probably not. The scribes whose job it is to copy the books? They do.
> God doesn't make neither typos nor contradictions.
God? Probably not. The scribes whose job it is to copy the books? They do.
I think we should not involve anyone's relegion in this forum
@Under-the-radar said in #54:
> God? Probably not. The scribes whose job it is to copy the books? They do.
I think they're supposed to copy-paste the verses without any contradiction and correctly, no?
If you say the scribes who copy the books made typos, they technically corrupted the bible, therefore it's not from God.
> God? Probably not. The scribes whose job it is to copy the books? They do.
I think they're supposed to copy-paste the verses without any contradiction and correctly, no?
If you say the scribes who copy the books made typos, they technically corrupted the bible, therefore it's not from God.
Let's stop it here.
@WassimBerbar said in #56:
> I think they're supposed to copy-paste the verses without any contradiction and correctly, no?
Are you aware that the option to copy-paste, although common on most modern devices, was not an option before computers were invented, and a fortiori 2000 years ago ?
> I think they're supposed to copy-paste the verses without any contradiction and correctly, no?
Are you aware that the option to copy-paste, although common on most modern devices, was not an option before computers were invented, and a fortiori 2000 years ago ?
@Under-the-radar said in #58:
> Are you aware that the option to copy-paste, although common on most modern devices, was not an option before computers were invented, and a fortiori 2000 years ago ?
No, I don't mean it like that, not like ctrl+c ctrl+v. I mean that the scribes should be able to rewrite the bible correctly.
> Are you aware that the option to copy-paste, although common on most modern devices, was not an option before computers were invented, and a fortiori 2000 years ago ?
No, I don't mean it like that, not like ctrl+c ctrl+v. I mean that the scribes should be able to rewrite the bible correctly.
@WassimBerbar said in #59:
> No, I don't mean it like that, not like ctrl+c ctrl+v. I mean that the scribes should be able to rewrite the bible correctly.
What if the previous scribe had an hard to read handwriting? What if water or insects damaged the paper, making hard to decipher? What if...?
> No, I don't mean it like that, not like ctrl+c ctrl+v. I mean that the scribes should be able to rewrite the bible correctly.
What if the previous scribe had an hard to read handwriting? What if water or insects damaged the paper, making hard to decipher? What if...?
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.